Friday, February 20, 2009

Reflection #3 - Cindy, Ronnelle, Desma

REFLECTION #3.

Engaging in the activity of the ALPHA BOX was very exciting for us as we tried to find the appropriate words to correspond to each letter of the alphabet. We decided to engage in a strategic way of accomplishing the task at hand, by sharing the letters (co-operative learning). Although it was not difficult, it was none the less challenging, and enlightening as it spoke to our consciences. As we educated ourselves on the many comprehension strategies, we kept reflecting on our practice. Some comprehension strategies really stood out to us and by the end of the exercise we noticed that we had ourselves engaged in some as we read the article. For a while as we sat there discussing the article, one person felt like she had not done justice to her students at all.

In all, we had to admit that we ourselves were learning to be strategic teachers and learners, as we continually engaged in the Recursive Process.

As we look back on our practice, we recognized that it was imperative that we first understood what was expected of us/our role, and thereafter only could we set expectations for our students. The creation of the ALPHA BOX, led us to admit the unfortunate reality that we did not adequately equip our students with the necessary tools to making them fluent and competent readers. Throughout the teaching process we were employing many of the comprehension strategies, however not focusing directly on teaching such strategies.

Our primary concern as language teachers was ensuring that our students merely understood what they read as in the case of the text book, and expected them to answer the questions that followed. Most times we assumed that the students understood the questions and thus, never ensured that they knew what was expected of them. We must attest to the fact that though we utilized questioning to aid comprehension, we neglected to effectively utilize such a critical comprehension strategy. It is no surprise that grades in language arts were generally disappointing for us especially after administering a test. Understanding and making connections was essential to the entire reading and writing process.

Our present goal is to ensure that we make our students aware of their own Meta cognition, and encourage the use of cognitive strategies whereby they could make a reading and writing connection. By the end of the teaching process, we should have engaged our students in the many strategies such as group work, peer tutoring, co- operative learning, that would allow them to appreciate their own learning styles, make their tasks easier and give them the opportunity to exhibit their work in the different modalities.

In summation, we would like to say that we are grateful for this exercise as it bestowed upon us a wealth of knowledge that will ensure our own self monitoring and equip students with a continuing structure for becoming effective/strategic readers and writers as they take charge of their own learning, with our continued guidance.

2 comments:

Jeanne said...

I had similar insights as you...that maybe I really did not do a good job with my students...I was focused more on the content of my subject area...and would give notes notes notes (like I had been given at school by my teachers) and wouldn't even tap into their prior knowledge. They were blank slates, empty vessels to me...I was superior to them because I was the holder of the knowledge...Thank God for teacher's college....Rude awakening for me...

Angelina said...

Well that is what teacher preparation programs are all about; it is our hpe that by the end of the two years you would have been a better teacher, one who is more competent and strategic.